Podcast Index
Explora podcasts por categoría, abre episodios recientes y descarga audio para escucharlo sin conexión.
Science of Justice
Jury Analyst
Fireside Chat with Dennis Prager | PragerU
PragerU
Jim Rohn Motivation Daily
Jim Rohn
Harvard Business Review
HBR
Evan Carmichael - Believe: Unlocking Your True Potential
Evan Carmichael
Pensieve - Benjamin Ross
Benjamin Ross
Ann Kroeker, Writing Coach
Ann Kroeker
Chitas for Kids Audio
Chitas for Kids
thethrasherway's podcast
Henry Thrasher
עלונימייל | Alonimail
Alonimail
English Learning for Curious Minds | A More Interesting Way To Learn English
Leonardo English
YIELD Today With Dallin Candland
Dallin
Mana pro tento den
Scripture Union ČR
The Way Out Is In
Plum Village
Republic Broadcasting Network
Republic Broadcasting Network
The Edge of Darkness w/ Jeffrey Bennett
The Edge of Darkness w/ Jeffrey Bennett
王先生の毎日中国語‧台湾華語
王先生
Your Quiet Moment
HavenMedia
Bible Answer Man Podcast with Hank Hanegraaff
The Christian Research Institute
Interviewhelden mit Markus Tirok
Markus Tirok
Der Kita Podcast für bedürfnisorientierte Pädagogik
Lea Wedewardt
Pädagogik&Pinot
Fea Finger & Sarah Bauer
The Salty Pastor
Dr. Douglas Peake
Sisters in Crime – Frauen, die töten
Jule Gölsdorf und Karolin Kandler
Markenkraft - Der Podcast über Markenführung und Markenforschung
Olaf Hartmann
הרב יאשיהו פינטו - ערוץ ה-HD
הרב יאשיהו פינטו
Ethan Brings You the World
Ethan Boronski
Cloudy Groovez
CLOUDY GROOVEZ
Nursing & Healthcare Exam Prep
Ran Chen, EA, CFP®
Hablar con Jesús
Hablar con Jesús
Your Mind, Your Body, Your Choice: It's YOUR Life...what are you going to do with it?
Sonya A McQueen
21 in 21
Hosted by Haley Berkoe
Finance Exam Prep
Ran Chen, EA, CFP®
Live Radiantly
WMPG
Innovación Bancolombia
Bancolombia
Fluent Fiction - Spanish
FluentFiction.org
Fluent Fiction - German
FluentFiction.org
Educación
Jury Analyst
Send us Fan MailMost trial teams build a case by following the litigation timeline. The strongest teams build it by starting with the verdict they need to achieve and working backward. In this episode, we explore why rev...
Send us Fan MailWhat if the most important decision in your case was made before opening statements even began?Jurors do not enter the courtroom as blank slates. They arrive with beliefs about personal responsibility, co...
Send us Fan MailTrial lawyers often rely on courtroom advice that sounds true because it has been repeated for years. But juries do not decide cases based on folklore. In this episode, we look at how behavioral science h...
Send us Fan MailMost case failures are not created three weeks before trial. They are discovered three weeks before trial.This episode examines how plaintiff cases lose leverage long before mediation, voir dire, or openi...
Send us Fan MailIn this episode, we explore the invisible emotional weight carried by plaintiff trial lawyers fighting for catastrophically injured clients. From the psychological pressure of litigation to the challenge ...
Send us Fan MailThe episode explores closing arguments from the juror’s perspective, not the lawyer’s. It examines how jurors process emotional pacing, trust, clarity, damages framing, cognitive load, and hidden friction...
Send us Fan MailYour case looks strong inside the war room. The facts line up. The liability theory works. The experts check every box.Then the jury sees a different case.This episode examines the gap between the visible...
Send us Fan MailYou can build a legally flawless case. Clear liability. Strong experts. Years of preparation. Full confidence inside the war room.And still lose.In this episode, we break down one of the most dangerous re...
Send us Fan MailThe traditional model of jury consulting—relying on episodic insight delivered late in the game—has reached its limits against the speed and complexity of modern civil litigation. A seemingly clear liabil...
Send us Fan MailYou think you have an eight-figure case. Liability is obvious. Damages are significant. Your team is aligned.But early confidence can cost you millions.Most plaintiff cases do not fall apart in the courtr...
Send us Fan MailMost plaintiff trial teams don’t lose because their case is weak—they lose because they misread how jurors interpret it. This episode breaks down the gap between internal case confidence and real jury beh...
Send us Fan MailTrial teams often walk into court with evidence that feels airtight. The documents line up. The timeline makes sense. The experts support the theory. But once the jury room door closes, that certainty can...
Send us Fan MailModern neurology and clinical neuropsychology have significantly advanced our understanding of traumatic brain injuries. Many injuries disrupt how the brain functions rather than how it looks on imaging. ...
Send us Fan MailExplores why internal agreement inside the trial war room often creates false confidence rather than real trial readiness.Breaks down the hidden psychological forces shaping plaintiff trial strategy, incl...
Send us Fan Mail It is rarely a single “smoking gun” in the evidence. More often, it is Drift, the slow, invisible shift where strategy moves away from how jurors actually process the case and toward how the legal team w...
Send us Fan MailWe unpack why strong-looking plaintiff cases die by a thousand cuts and show how to detect and repair narrative decay with the Narrative Stability Index. Jurors build stories, not spreadsheets, so we trac...
Send us Fan MailWe argue that the “strong facts equal strong case” formula is broken, and lay out a new model where trial lawyers become decision architects who win the heart first, then the mind. Using research, case st...
Send us Fan MailWe challenge the myth that verdicts are decided by chaos in the courtroom and show how internal biases quietly compress case value. We lay out a practical framework—psychological safety, structured dissen...
Send us Fan MailWe challenge the old belief that strong facts guarantee strong verdicts and show why juror psychology now sets case value. We map a path to decision architecture across intake, discovery, narrative design...
We argue that persuasion in high-stakes civil cases starts six to twelve months before trial, not two months out. By testing themes early, mapping story features to legal elements, and owning the language, we guide juror...
Completa el formulario de abajo. Asegúrate de seleccionar tanto País como Géneros.
Envíanos un mensaje abajo. Te responderemos en un plazo de 24 horas.